Rural public transport service has limited coverage, sparse service, and requires cross subsidy for equity and development

Submitted by john on Tue, 17/12/2019 - 14:40
Scenic rail Victoria

Public transport is scheduled for sparse service, particularly in the country, where commuting to Melbourne has the best service at ½ to 2 hour frequency, other services to Melbourne are daily, circulation within major towns is hourly and service between towns is weekly.

Although not an issue for Melbourne, the frequency and connectivity of public transport in rural areas of Victoria could not be described as a reasonable service. Whereas trains and buses can only recover 22% of costs in Melbourne, in rural areas with longer distances and lower patronage, the outcome is lower frequencies, if there is a service at all.

QGIS with Open Street Map, JC July 2020

In locations where there is only one bus trip per week, it is not even practical to go shopping. Low cost transport should be considered a basic right, for equity. The map shows a network servicing towns with 1,000 population. The blue routes have the highest potential traffic, but the network should be extended as a developmental initiative to include the red routes. Then operation of the network at cost would extend the scope of the service, providing cheap instant transport access 24/7 to the entire rural area of Victoria, for schools, shops, health, employment, business, freight and tourism.

Requirements:  To provide immediate service 24/7 for all rural areas some other form of transport should be investigated. Further developmental investment is required to give accessibility for remote areas and for tourism. Destinations should include local schools, shops and employment. For schools, a podcar network, the size of the Highway system, as mapped, is envisaged, with feeder routes in the form of off-road cycle paths for safety. Podcars can carry bikes.

Conclusion for Objectives and Requirements
For the objectives of road safety; congestion removal; fast trip times; profitability; job creation; reliability; and CO2 reduction; there are practical requirements that will dramatically deliver desirable outcomes. For the objectives of security; and amenity; there are practical requirements that will deliver major improvements in outcomes, far better than the existing tolerated conditions, even if less than optimal. Rural service will require higher speeds and was not developed as a proposal.
Action is warranted on every one of these ten issues.